|
Introduction
The Cuba Issue Collective
Section
I: Economy and Society
Section
II: Government
Section
III: The Agrarian Sector
(The introductions
listed above preface each section of the issue. You can order a copy of
the Cuba issue and get the full texts of each section by calling (617)
776-9505 or emailing us at info@sdonline.org.
The table of contents of the entire
issue can be viewed in the back issues section.)
=============================
Section
I: Economy and Society
Introduction
Every Cuban
felt the effect of the economic crisis following the collapse of the Eastern
socialist bloc and the suspension of CMEA (socialist bloc common market)
trading agreements. From 1990 to 1993, according to official statistics,
the GNP fell by just under 35% and consumption plummeted (including such
basics as food). The crisis affected not only living standards but social
relations and political morale as well.
To promote
recovery, Cuba in the early 1990s undertook major reforms. These included
expanding opportunities for self-employment in small-scale individual
and family owned businesses. Cuba also invited foreign capital to join
in large-scale investments, especially in the tourism sector. While courting
foreign capitalist investment and expanding the areas for individual enterprise
may have been the only option, this policy poses real risks by enlarging
the non-socialist sectors of the economy. Indeed, several economic factors
are operating which make it difficult to preserve economic and social
equality. These include: the need to accommodate to the demands of the
international market; hard currency remittances from abroad to some families
but not others; foreign investment; and the growth of small privately-owned
businesses in various forms, some legal, some quasi-legal, and others
clearly in the black market. By these and other means, some people get
access to dollars, enhancing their opportunities for consumption and investment.
During the
first years of the crisis, almost everyone lost ground. The impact of
the slow recovery beginning in 1994, however, while improving everyone's
lives, did not affect everyone equally. Inequalities developed based on
people's access to dollars. Increasing social inequality raises questions
about where the Revolution is heading. Is the Revolution's egalitarian
project secure, or do the new economic policies threaten a creeping capitalism?
In the aftermath of the economic crisis, Cuba faces major challenges in
the effort to achieve economic recovery and still preserve revolutionary
gains.
Cubans who
analyze their own society forthrightly acknowledge the severe hardships
imposed by the crisis and its differential impact on diverse population
groups. This section includes articles by three Cuban social scientists
working in Cuba and one now living in the United States, who examine the
varied impact of policies designed to achieve economic recovery. They
consider what these policies may mean for Cuba's future in economic, social,
and political terms.
Pedro Monreal,
an economist at the University of Havana, provides an overview of the
policies of economic recovery in the 1990s, notably the partial, de facto
dollarization of the economy and the joint ventures with foreign capital
in certain areas of the economy. While these policies have permitted a
recovery in production and standards of living, he argues, they introduce
distortions. He proposes a long-term development strategy which promotes
cumulative growth by taking advantage of the high level of education of
the Cuban population, and which orients export production toward technologically
advanced and knowledge- intensive products and services (e.g. bio-tech,
health services) rather than products and services based on the intensive
use of natural resources (e.g. sugar, minerals or citrus).
Mayra Paula
Espina Prieto, a sociologist working at the Center for Psychological and
Sociological Research, examines the effects of economic reform on Cuban
social structure. She considers the hypothesis that those who are taking
advantage of the liberalization of rules for private economic activity
are becoming the nucleus of an emerging petite bourgeoisie. Self-employment
is highly regulated, but some individuals have been able to enrich themselves
through small business activities. Acknowledging that the reforms have
brought profound social changes, Espina cautiously argues that as long
as the development model continues to emphasize state property, socially
guided redistribution, and collective social services, Cuba's economy
will remain socialist.
Alejandro
de la Fuente, an historian at the University of Pittsburgh, examines the
status of blacks and mulattos in the past decades and, more specifically,
the impact of the crisis on that group. He argues that while blacks and
mulattos ranked among the major beneficiaries of the Revolution and have
traditionally supported it enthusiastically, the crisis appears to have
affected them harder than others. Further, white Cubans feel freer today
to express racist attitudes than they did during the first three decades
of the revolution. Consequently, he contends, some blacks and mulattos
have become more openly disaffected with the Revolution.
Marta Núñez
Sarmiento, professor of sociology at the University of Havana, analyzes
the effect of the changing economic structure on the employment of professional
women. Unlike the other authors, she blends macroeconomic data with women's
own accounts. Her sample shows a high level of professional commitment,
but those in her universe continue to suffer from unequal pay (despite
mandated equality, most women work in lower-wage sectors of the economy)
and the obligation to care for children and elderly family members.
They have,
therefore, devised survival strategies which take advantage of the gains
made under the Revolution, particularly in educational opportunities,
and at the same time rely on traditional family and community ties. While
confronting the special burdens that the reforms have imposed on women
and the still prevalent sexist attitudes among spouses, male co-workers,
and other men, women have learned to use the revolutionary gains to their
advantage.
Since the debt crisis of 1982, most Latin American countries have adopted
austerity programs which have impoverished much of their population. The
poor and lower middle groups bear most of the burden.
The benefits
of the recent "recovery" have mainly accrued to the wealthy,
further exacerbating economic inequality. Cuba too has been forced into
austerity, and while the pain has been felt among all sectors of society,
some have clearly suffered more than others. The government, nonetheless,
has maintained essential social services for all, albeit at lower levels.
No school or hospital has been closed, and health care is still universally
available and accessible, although at reduced levels of efficiency. Cuba
must strike a delicate balance, however, between accommodating to the
world market and maintaining its commitment to equality. The articles
in this section illustrate some of the ways that the Cubans have grappled
with the problem and have confronted the dilemmas raised in trying to
pursue economic growth based on foreign capital while maintaining socialism.
|